QAnon Explained

Buena parte de los asaltantes del Capitolio el 6 de enero de 2021 portaban banderas o pancartas con una Q, símbolo de un oscuro movimiento conspiracionista alineado con la alt-right que lleva años cociéndose en internet. ¿Cuál es su mensaje, contra qué luchan y qué pretenden?

Julia Carrie Wong

Bandera USA
Molly Malcolm

Speaker (American accent)

Actualizado a

Q

Escucha este articulo

Imprimir

To Donald Trump, it’s “people who love our country.” To the FBI, it’s a potential domestic terror threat. And to you or anyone else who has logged on to Facebook in recent months, it may just be a friend or family member who has started to show an alarming interest in child trafficking, the “cabal”, or conspiracy theories about Bill Gates and the coronavirus.

This is QAnon, a wide-ranging and baseless internet conspiracy theory that reached the American mainstream in August. The movement has been festering on the fringes of right-wing internet communities for years, but its visibility has exploded in recent months amid the social unrest and uncertainty of the coronavirus pandemic.

So what is QAnon? “QAnon” is a baseless internet conspiracy theory whose followers believe that a cabal of Satan-worshipping Democrats, Hollywood celebrities and billionaires runs the world while engaging in pedophilia, human trafficking and the harvesting of a supposedly life-extending chemical from the blood of abused children. QAnon followers believe that Donald Trump main goal as president was to wage a secret battle against this cabal and its “deep state” collaborators to expose the malefactors and send them all to Guantanamo Bay.

There are many, many threads of the QAnon narrative, all as far-fetched and evidence-free as the rest, including subplots that focus on John F. Kennedy Jr. being alive (he isn’t), the Rothschild family controlling all the banks (they don’t) and children being sold through the website of the furniture retailer Wayfair (they aren’t.) Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, George Soros, Bill Gates, Tom Hanks, Oprah Winfrey, Chrissy Teigen and Pope Francis are just some of the people whom QAnon followers have cast as villains in their alternative reality.

QAnon has its roots in previously established conspiracy theories, some relatively new and some a millennium old. The contemporary antecedent is Pizzagate, the conspiracy theory that went viral during the 2016 presidential campaign when right-wing news outlets and influencers promoted the baseless idea that references to food and a popular Washington DC pizza restaurant in the stolen emails of Clinton campaign manager John Podesta were actually a secret code for a child trafficking ring. The theory touched off serious harassment of the restaurant and its employees, culminating in a December 2016 shooting by a man who had travelled to the restaurant believing there were children there in need of rescue.

QAnon evolved out of Pizzagate and includes many of the same basic characters and plotlines without the easily disprovable specifics. But QAnon also has its roots in much older antisemitic conspiracy theories. The idea of the all-powerful, world-ruling cabal comes straight out of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a fake document purporting to expose a Jewish plot to control the world that was used throughout the 20th century to justify antisemitism. Another QAnon canard —the idea that members of the cabal extract the chemical adrenochrome from the blood of their child victims and ingest it to extend their lives— is a modern remix of the age-old antisemitic blood libel.

“Q” emerged on October 28th 2017 from the primordial swamp of the internet on the message board 4chan with a post in which he confidently asserted that Hillary Clinton’s “extradition” was “already in motion” and her arrest imminent. In subsequent posts —there have been more than four thousand so far— Q established his legend as a government insider with top security clearance who knew the truth about the secret struggle for power between Trump and the “deep state.”

Q’s posts are extremely cryptic. They often consist of a long string of questions designed to guide readers toward discovering the ‘truth’ for themselves through ‘research’. As with Clinton’s supposed extradition, Q has consistently made predictions that failed to come to pass, but true believers tend to simply adapt their narratives to account for inconsistencies.

For close followers of QAnon, the posts (or ‘drops’) contain ‘crumbs’ of intelligence that they ‘bake’ into ‘proofs’. For ‘bakers’, QAnon is both a fun hobby and a deadly serious calling. It’s a kind of participatory internet scavenger hunt with incredibly high stakes and a ready-made community of fellow adherents.

Anonymous internet posters who claim to have access to secret information are fairly common, and they usually disappear once people lose interest or realize they are being fooled. QAnon might have faded away as well, were it not for the dedicated work of three conspiracy theorists who latched on to it at the very beginning and translated it into a digestible narrative for mainstream social media networks. A 2018 investigation by NBC News uncovered how this trio worked together to promote and profit off QAnon, turning it into the broad, multi-platform internet phenomenon that it is today. There now exists an entire QAnon media ecosystem, with enormous amounts of video content, memes, e-books, chatrooms, and more, all designed to snare the interest of potential recruits, then draw them “down the rabbit hole” and into QAnon’s alternate reality.

Nobody knows how many people believe in QAnon, but it’s fair to say at least one hundred thousand people. In general, QAnon appears to be most popular among older Republicans and evangelical Christians. There are subcultures within QAnon for people who approach studying Q drops in a manner similar to Bible study. Other followers appear to have come to QAnon from New Age spiritual movements, from more traditional conspiracy theory communities, or from the far right. It is almost exclusively a conservative movement, and QAnon has spread to Latin America and Europe, where it appears to be catching on among certain far-right movements.

So why does QAnon matter? First, there’s the threat of violence. For those who truly believe that powerful figures are holding children hostage in order to exploit them sexually or for their blood, taking action to stop the abuse can seem like a moral imperative. While most QAnon followers will not engage in violence, many already have, or have attempted to, which is why the FBI has identified the movement as a potential domestic terror threat. Participation in QAnon also often involves vicious online harassment campaigns against perceived enemies, which can have serious consequences for the targets.

Participating in QAnon is largely made up of “research” —i.e. learning more about the byzantine theories or decoding Q drops —and evangelism. Most of the proselytization relies on media manipulation tactics designed to catch users’ attention and send them into a controlled online media environment where they will become ‘redpilled’ through consuming pro-QAnon content.

QAnon followers have for years used a wide range of online tactics to achieve virality and garner mainstream media coverage, including making documentaries full of misinformation, hijacking trending hashtags with QAnon messaging, showing up at Trump rallies with Q signs, or running for elected office.

A very potent iteration of this tactic emerged this summer with the #SaveTheChildren or #SaveOurChildren campaign. The innocuous sounding hashtag, which had previously been used by anti-child-trafficking NGOs, has been flooded with emotive content by QAnon adherents hinting at the broader QAnon narrative.

On Facebook, anxiety over children due to the coronavirus pandemic, a resurgent anti-vaxx movement, and QAnon-fueled scaremongering about child trafficking have all combined to inspire a modern-day moral panic.

Hundreds of real-life “Save Our Children” protests have been organized on Facebook in communities across the US (and around the world.) These small rallies are in turn driving local news coverage by outlets who don’t realize that by publishing news designed to “raise awareness” about child trafficking, they are encouraging their readers or viewers to head to the internet, where a search for “save our children” could send them straight down the QAnon rabbit hole.

More in C2 Advanced

Journalism: A Question of Trust
GETTY IMAGES

Current Affairs

Journalism: A Question of Trust

Actualmente, los medios de comunicación tradicionales deben competir con infinidad de fuentes de dudosa credibilidad que emiten interpretaciones contradictorias de la realidad. ¿Debemos aceptar que el concepto de verdad objetiva es una ilusión?

Alex Phillips

 The New York Times: “Labour Won in a Landslide but...”

Current Affairs

The New York Times: “Labour Won in a Landslide but...”

Después de catorce años, los laboristas regresan al gobierno británico con una amplia mayoría, gracias en gran parte al sistema electoral. Pero ni el respaldo popular es masivo ni la tarea será fácil.

Mark Landler

More in Explore

TODAY’S TOP STORIES